Abstract

Summary

This study surveyed 140 architecture students on their perception and knowledge of daylight conditions, comparing subjective assessments with expert evaluations and measured illuminance data. Findings indicate significant gaps in students' understanding of daylight metrics and simulation tools, suggesting that architectural education needs more coherent and practical daylight training to produce better-informed designers.
Abstract

Key Findings

  • 140 architecture students were surveyed; their subjective appraisals of luminous comfort were compared against expert assessments and on-site illuminance measurements, revealing discrepancies between student perception and objective data.
  • Students encountered notable difficulties interpreting daylight simulation indices, highlighting a need for improved daylight education curricula in architecture programs.
  • No specific quantitative effect sizes or p-values were reported in the abstract.
Categories

Categories

Student Learning: Investigates architecture students' comprehension of daylight metrics, simulation tools, and luminous comfort assessment in educational settings.
The Science of Light: Examines understanding of daylight indices, illuminance measurements, and simulation methods relevant to lighting design standards and metrics.
Authors

Author(s)

N Sokol
Publication Date

Publication Year

2019
View more publications