Abstract

Summary

Evening exposure to intermittent bright light (alternating 30-min pulses of ~1000 lux, 6000K with 30-min dim light) was as effective as continuous bright light in boosting alertness but equally detrimental to subsequent sleep quality. Lighting designers and healthcare practitioners should be cautious about using high-intensity, blue-enriched light in the hours before bedtime, even when delivered intermittently.
Abstract

Key Findings

  • Both intermittent and continuous bright light (~1000 lux, ~6000K) significantly decreased sleep efficiency (SE) and total sleep time (TST) compared to dim light (~5 lux).
  • Intermittent bright light significantly increased objective alertness compared to dim light during the second half of the 3-hour light-exposure period.
  • Intermittent bright light was not statistically different from continuous bright light in its effects on subjective alertness or sleep architecture, suggesting intermittency does not mitigate sleep disruption.
  • Study used a within-subject design with 15 healthy young volunteers (mean age 20 ± 3.4 years) across four laboratory nights separated by at least one week.
Categories

Categories

Sleep & Circadian Health: Examines how intermittent versus continuous evening bright light exposure affects sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and subsequent sleep architecture.
Workplace Performance: Measures acute effects of intermittent and continuous bright light on subjective and objective alertness during evening light exposure periods.
Authors

Author(s)

M Yang, N Ma, Y Zhu, YC Su, Q Chen
Publication Date

Publication Year

2018
Citations

Number of Citations

39
View more publications