Abstract

Summary

At the low illuminance levels typical of road lighting (1–100 lx in mesopic range), circadian stimulus values for most light sources fall at or below the threshold of CS=0.05, suggesting circadian disruption is not a major concern for roadway applications. Lighting designers can therefore prioritize mesopic efficiency (S/P ratio optimization) when selecting road light sources, as this strategy is largely compatible with minimizing unwanted circadian activation.
Abstract

Key Findings

  • EML values for road lighting sources remain below 50 EML under mesopic vision conditions (photopic illuminance 1–100 lx).
  • CS values for most road lighting sources fall at or below the circadian threshold of 0.05, indicating negligible circadian stimulus.
  • S/P ratio correlates more strongly with EML and CS than correlated color temperature (CCT) does, making S/P ratio a better proxy for circadian impact in road lighting selection.
  • Several light sources were identified that simultaneously achieve high mesopic efficiency and low CS, offering a compatible optimization pathway for road lighting.
Categories

Categories

The Science of Light: Analyzes melanopic EDI (EML), circadian light (CLA), and circadian stimulus (CS) metrics alongside S/P ratios across mesopic illuminance levels relevant to road lighting.
Sleep & Circadian Health: Evaluates the practical significance of circadian disruption from road lighting exposure under mesopic vision conditions.
Authors

Author(s)

M Li, P Wu, J Ding, Q Yao, J Ju
Publication Date

Publication Year

2020
Citations

Number of Citations

9
View more publications